Telehealth Medicaid Coverage by State

Medicaid telehealth coverage is determined at the state level within a federal statutory floor, producing 50 distinct policy environments that vary by covered service types, eligible originating sites, reimbursement rates, and technology requirements. Federal statutes — principally the Social Security Act and regulations codified at 42 CFR Part 440 — establish minimum standards, but states exercise broad discretion over benefit design. Understanding how this structure works is essential for health systems, federally qualified health centers, and policy analysts tracking access to remote care for Medicaid-enrolled populations.

Definition and scope

Medicaid telehealth coverage refers to the set of policies governing when and how a state Medicaid program reimburses healthcare services delivered through telecommunications technology rather than in-person contact. Under federal law, states are not required to cover telehealth as a distinct benefit category; instead, they must cover the same services they would cover in person when those services are delivered via qualifying technology — a principle sometimes called the "same service" standard (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicaid Telehealth).

The scope of telehealth under Medicaid spans three primary delivery modalities: live video (synchronous two-way audio-visual communication), store-and-forward (asynchronous transmission of medical data such as images or diagnostic files — see Store-and-Forward Telehealth), and remote patient monitoring (ongoing collection of patient physiologic data outside a clinical setting — see Remote Patient Monitoring Overview). A fourth category — audio-only telephonic visits — became a contested coverage area after temporary COVID-19 flexibilities expanded its use across most states (telehealth COVID-19 policy changes).

As of the data maintained by the Center for Connected Health Policy (CCHP), all 50 states and the District of Columbia have enacted some form of Medicaid telehealth reimbursement policy, though the breadth, payment parity, and eligible service categories differ substantially from state to state (CCHP State Telehealth Laws and Reimbursement Policies).

Core mechanics or structure

State Medicaid telehealth reimbursement operates through four structural levers: benefit definition, originating site designation, distant site eligibility, and technology standards.

Benefit definition specifies which CPT or HCPCS codes are eligible for telehealth delivery. States file these determinations in their Medicaid State Plans, which are submitted to and approved by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Amendments to approved State Plans — called State Plan Amendments (SPAs) — are the formal mechanism by which states expand or restrict their telehealth benefits (42 CFR § 430.12).

Originating site policies define where the patient must be physically located during a telehealth encounter. Historically, states restricted originating sites to clinical facilities — hospitals, clinics, or federally qualified health centers — but post-2020 policies in most states permit the patient's home as an eligible originating site for at least some service categories.

Distant site eligibility determines which provider types can bill for a telehealth encounter. All states allow physicians; coverage for non-physician practitioners (nurse practitioners, licensed clinical social workers, licensed professional counselors) varies and is enumerated in each state's SPA or managed care contract terms.

Technology standards set the minimum requirements for the qualifying platform. Most states require HIPAA-compliant video platforms for live video claims, though audio-only exceptions apply in a subset of states for mental health and substance use disorder services. The Telehealth HIPAA Compliance Requirements framework from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services provides the federal floor for platform security.

States that operate Medicaid managed care programs — which constitutes the coverage model for approximately 72 percent of Medicaid enrollees, according to KFF's Medicaid managed care enrollment data (KFF Medicaid Managed Care) — must also incorporate telehealth coverage into their managed care contracts under 42 CFR § 438, though specific benefit designs may differ from fee-for-service coverage within the same state.

Causal relationships or drivers

State-level variation in Medicaid telehealth coverage is driven by four identifiable causal forces.

Legislative action is the primary driver. States that have passed explicit telehealth parity laws — requiring Medicaid to reimburse telehealth services at the same rate as in-person equivalents — have consistently broader coverage than states without such statutes. As of the CCHP's 2023 policy tracking data, 40 states and the District of Columbia have enacted some form of Medicaid payment parity provision, though the scope of parity (full versus partial, specific service categories only) varies (CCHP, 2023 Report).

Federal emergency authority expanded coverage significantly. During the COVID-19 public health emergency, CMS issued blanket waivers under Section 1135 of the Social Security Act that relaxed originating site restrictions, added audio-only coverage, and expanded eligible provider types across all states. Many states subsequently codified these expansions into permanent State Plan amendments or state statute, while others allowed them to lapse. The federal COVID-19 public health emergency ended May 11, 2023, and Section 1135 waivers tied to it expired accordingly; continued coverage in specific states reflects state-level permanent policy adoption, not ongoing federal emergency authority.

Federal legislative reform has also shaped the policy landscape. The Social Security Fairness Act of 2023, enacted January 5, 2025, amended the Social Security Act in ways that bear on benefit coordination for certain Medicaid-eligible populations, and state Medicaid agencies are evaluating downstream effects on eligibility and coverage determinations for affected beneficiaries.

Medicaid managed care contracting creates a second policy layer. States negotiate telehealth coverage requirements into managed care organization (MCO) contracts separately from fee-for-service policies, meaning enrolled beneficiaries may experience different coverage depending on their plan.

Rural health infrastructure pressures have accelerated coverage expansion in states with large rural populations. The Telehealth Rural Health Access dimension of this policy debate — particularly for behavioral health services — has driven specific legislative action in states including Montana, North Dakota, and Alaska, where geographic barriers to in-person care are measurably severe.

Classification boundaries

Medicaid telehealth coverage policies cluster into three recognizable tiers of comprehensiveness, as analyzed in annual CCHP policy reports.

Broad coverage states reimburse telehealth for a wide range of service categories including primary care, behavioral health, specialty care, dental consultation, and remote patient monitoring. Live video, store-and-forward, and audio-only are each separately authorized. Payment parity with in-person services is codified in statute. California, New York, and Texas are representative examples with extensive published State Plan telehealth provisions.

Moderate coverage states reimburse live video broadly but restrict store-and-forward to specific specialties (most commonly teledermatology and teleophthalmology) and have not extended full payment parity. Audio-only coverage may be limited to behavioral health. These states typically authorize home as an originating site for behavioral health but not for all service types.

Narrow coverage states have defined a limited set of eligible CPT codes, restrict originating sites to clinical facilities, and have not enacted payment parity. Reimbursement rates in these states may be set at a discount to in-person rates, and non-physician providers face more restrictive billing eligibility.

The State Telehealth Laws and Policies reference framework provides the most granular classification tool, cross-referencing statutes, regulations, and State Plan provisions for each jurisdiction. Service-type classification (synchronous versus asynchronous delivery modes) is explained further at Synchronous vs Asynchronous Telehealth.

Tradeoffs and tensions

Rate parity versus budget impact. States that mandate full payment parity for telehealth services face actuarial pressure on Medicaid budgets because telehealth parity can increase utilization volume. A 2022 Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission (MACPAC) analysis noted that the expansion of telehealth coverage increased Medicaid behavioral health service utilization rates in states that implemented broad parity, creating both access benefits and cost pressures (MACPAC, Report to Congress on Medicaid and CHIP, March 2022).

Audio-only access versus quality standards. Audio-only telephonic visits improve access for beneficiaries without reliable broadband or video-capable devices — a population disproportionately represented in Medicaid — but lack the clinical assessment capability of video encounters. The tension between access equity and clinical quality standards has no consensus resolution at the federal level.

Managed care flexibility versus beneficiary consistency. When states allow MCOs discretion to define their own telehealth policies within the bounds of managed care contracts, beneficiaries on different MCO plans within the same state may face different coverage rules, creating confusion and unequal access within a nominally unified state Medicaid program.

Provider licensure portability. Cross-state telehealth encounters require that providers hold licensure in the patient's state. The Interstate Medical Licensure Compact addresses this for physicians in member states, but its scope does not extend to all provider types that Medicaid reimburses for telehealth.

Common misconceptions

Misconception: Federal law requires all states to cover telehealth. Federal Medicaid law does not mandate telehealth coverage as an independent benefit category. CMS guidance makes clear that states have the option — not obligation — to cover telehealth, and that when they do, coverage must be equivalent in scope to in-person services for the same code (CMS, Medicaid Telehealth Overview).

Misconception: Medicaid telehealth parity means the same dollar amount as in-person. Payment parity statutes typically require that Medicaid reimburse telehealth services at the same rate as in-person equivalents for the same CPT code. They do not require states to pay the same absolute dollar amount as commercial insurers, nor do they override state-specific fee schedules.

Misconception: A provider licensed in one state can deliver telehealth Medicaid services to patients in any state. Medicaid reimbursement eligibility is state-specific, and providers must meet each state's enrollment, licensure, and credentialing requirements to bill that state's Medicaid program — regardless of any federal telehealth flexibility.

Misconception: CMS COVID-19 waivers are still active. The federal COVID-19 public health emergency ended May 11, 2023, and Section 1135 waivers tied to it expired accordingly. Continued coverage in specific states reflects state-level permanent policy adoption, not ongoing federal emergency authority.

Misconception: The Social Security Fairness Act of 2023 directly expands Medicaid telehealth benefits. The Social Security Fairness Act of 2023, enacted January 5, 2025, primarily amended the Social Security Act to repeal the Windfall Elimination Provision and Government Pension Offset affecting Social Security benefits for certain public employees. While it may affect the benefit coordination and income circumstances of some dually eligible or Medicaid-enrolled individuals, it does not directly establish or expand Medicaid telehealth coverage requirements. State Medicaid agencies are responsible for assessing any indirect eligibility or coordination effects on their enrolled populations.

Checklist or steps (non-advisory)

The following sequence reflects the policy elements that a Medicaid program must address when establishing or modifying telehealth coverage. It is a structural description of the regulatory process, not guidance for any specific party.

  1. Identify applicable federal baseline requirements under the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.), as amended — including the Social Security Fairness Act of 2023 (enacted January 5, 2025) — and CMS guidance on Medicaid telehealth.
  2. Determine service categories to be covered, mapped to specific CPT/HCPCS codes, and specify whether each code is eligible for live video, store-and-forward, audio-only, or remote patient monitoring delivery.
  3. Define originating site eligibility — enumerate whether patient home, federally qualified health centers (see Federally Qualified Health Center Telehealth), rural health clinics, hospitals, or other settings qualify.
  4. Enumerate eligible distant site provider types — specify which licensed provider categories may bill under each covered code.
  5. Set payment rate methodology — determine whether parity with in-person rates applies, or whether a separate telehealth fee schedule governs.
  6. Draft State Plan Amendment language consistent with 42 CFR § 430.12 and submit to CMS for review and approval.
  7. Incorporate coverage terms into managed care contracts under 42 CFR § 438 if managed care delivery is used, ensuring consistency with fee-for-service State Plan provisions.
  8. Establish technology standards referencing HIPAA Security Rule requirements (45 CFR Part 164) for covered platforms.
  9. Publish provider billing guidance documenting applicable modifiers, place-of-service codes, and documentation requirements.
  10. Conduct periodic review against updated CCHP policy data and CMS sub-regulatory guidance to identify required SPA updates, including assessment of any eligibility or benefit coordination changes arising from the Social Security Fairness Act of 2023.

Reference table or matrix

The table below summarizes the policy status of key telehealth coverage dimensions across a representative sample of states, based on published CCHP State Telehealth Laws and Reimbursement Policies data and state Medicaid agency publications. Policy status is subject to change through legislative action or SPA approval.

State Live Video Covered Store-and-Forward Covered Audio-Only Covered Home as Originating Site Medicaid Payment Parity
California Yes Yes Yes (behavioral health) Yes Yes (statute)
Texas Yes Yes (limited specialties) Yes (behavioral health) Yes Partial
New York Yes Limited Yes Yes Yes (statute)
Florida Yes No Limited Partial No
Illinois Yes Limited Yes Yes Yes (statute)
Montana Yes No Yes Yes Yes (statute)
Alaska Yes Yes Yes Yes Partial
Mississippi Yes No No No No
Ohio Yes Limited Yes (behavioral health) Yes Partial
Colorado Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes (statute)

Sources: Center for Connected Health Policy State Telehealth Laws and Reimbursement Policies (CCHP); individual state Medicaid agency State Plan documents. Table reflects policy direction as reported in CCHP tracking; consult individual state Medicaid agency publications for current effective policy.

References

📜 4 regulatory citations referenced  ·  ✅ Citations verified Feb 25, 2026  ·  View update log

Explore This Site

Regulations & Safety Regulatory References
Topics (58)
Tools & Calculators Bmi Health Metrics Calculator